Many people think of crowdfunding platforms as just being donation-based, but some platforms also offer reward-based, equity-based, and debt-based crowdfunding models.

• Reward-based crowdfunding: Allows investors to contribute to a project idea in return for a product. E.g. some of the most successful projects on Kickstarter, a leading crowdfunding platform, usually offer products to early investors.
• Donation-based crowdfunding: Allows people in need to raise funds for social or charitable causes. E.g. GoFundMe has helped individuals raise over 9 billion US dollars for social causes ranging from medical costs, education expenses, etc.
• Equity-based crowdfunding: Allows businesses to raise funds by offering equity in exchange. According to Statista, equity-based crowdfunding platforms raised 4.41 billion US dollars globally in 2020.
• Debt-based crowdfunding: Allows businesses to raise money via debt from a pool of investors. This option is favorable as interest rates are lower than applying for a loan through a bank.

Navigating Challenges in Decentralized Crowdfunding Platforms: Insights and Solutions! Click here to Overcome Roadblocks!

Existing centralized crowdfunding platforms lack accountability, trust, and transparency. By incorporating blockchain technology and deploying smart contracts, we can overcome these challenges eventually making crowdfunding an even more effective means of funding a variety of projects and causes. If you need help understanding blockchain technology and smart contracts, we've already compiled a Thorough article on the subject.

1. Accountability

By far the biggest issue with existing centralized crowdfunding platforms is accountability. If a creator or business doesn't deliver on what it promised, who shall be held accountable? The creator or the crowdfunding platform?

For instance, iBackPack was a crowdfunding project launched by Doug Monahan on Indiegogo in 2015 and again in 2016 on Kickstarter The idea was to create a backpack that could hold all the electronic devices of the user. The fundraising campaign was successful and raised more than $800,000.

However, investors never actually received the backpack. After receiving multiple complaints, the FTC started investigating and found out that Doug Monahan never actually spent the funds on manufacturing the backpacks. Instead, he allegedly used the money for purchasing Bitcoin, ATM Withdrawals, paying off his credit cards, and buying advertising for other business ventures. The FTC reached a settlement banning Doug from engaging in any new crowdfunding activities. However, FTC was unable to recover the funds raised for the project because Doug seemingly spent all the money. He was required to report his finances for the next 20 years and if any new assets are uncovered, he would be forced to pay up.

Instances like these negatively impact users' trust in creators as well as these crowdfunding platforms. As a result, new crowdfunding platforms may find difficulty in building credibility.

With crowdfunding campaigns running on blockchain, a smart contract would be created specifying milestones of the project. The funds are held until a milestone is achieved and verified by the investors. This would ensure that the investment received is used the way it was said to be by the creator.

2. Transparency

An investor would want to know how their funds are being utilized and moving in the system. For this information, they have to rely on the creator/business, and usually, the information provided is not verifiable. This manual tracking and reporting is a time-consuming process and also prone to manipulation.

Blockchain being a public ledger, everyone can see how funds are moving in the system but no one can manipulate the data due to its immutability.

3. Rules and regulation

Centralized crowdfunding platforms have strict requirements on which ideas can be listed on their platform. So even though a creator might have a great idea, it may not get approved.

On the contrary, a decentralized crowdfunding platform would be accessible to every creator. They would no longer have to rely on centralized platforms for approvals and abide by their stringent rules and regulations. It would be the investors who would vet the campaigns and choose the ones in which they believe.

4. High platform fees

Crowdfunding platforms take a cut out of every project that gets listed on their platform. While some platforms charge flat fees, some require a percentage of the total money raised. For instance, Kickstarter charges a 5% platform fee, along with payment processing fees (between 3% and 5%).

With the use of blockchain, these transaction fees would be drastically reduced making crowdfunding less expensive for creators and investors.

In the case of a crowdfunding scam, investors have nowhere else to turn, other than the platform or government agencies. Since crowdfunding platforms are merely service providers, there isn't much they can do. Kickstarter and Indigego had previously said that investments come with risks. These platforms have mechanisms in place to ensure that creators are transparent and publicly visible but at the end of the day, they want investors to vet the campaigns before investing.

With the crowdfunding industry being plagued with so many challenges, a blockchain revolution is much needed. It would help crowdfunding become an even more accessible, transparent, trustworthy, and effective means of funding a variety of projects and social causes.

If you're planning on building a decentralized crowdfunding platform, you can always seek help from an expert blockchain development team. Please feel free to schedule a call with one of our experts to discuss your project.